Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by CoastalCoder 1033 days ago
I hear you, and partially agree with your points. For various reasons it's a complicated decision.
2 comments

I'd just like to point out that I think you confused another person who replied (Our_Benefactors) with me, and my read of that person's comments is that they were trying to justify you accepting a job with Meta, not discourage you from taking it.

That said, while I absolutely appreciate the need to provide for your family, if you can get a job offer from Meta, you could get a job offer at countless other companies that aren't directly contributing to the downfall of civilization.

> I'd just like to point out that I think you confused another person who replied (Our_Benefactors) with me,

Oops, sorry :)

> if you can get a job offer from Meta, you could get a job offer at countless other companies that aren't directly contributing to the downfall of civilization.

I've been unemployed for 5 months now, and looking hard.

You may be trivially correct, if I end up not getting an offer from Meta. ;)

Now, as you might expect, I don't seek the downfall of civilization. But I can't think of a single employer whose work is entirely safe from that accusation, so it's a question of tradeoffs and guesses regardless.

They’re trying to pay you more than you currently make, or offer some kind of career growth you don’t currently have, and you have bills to pay and ambitions in life. It’s not complicated. Telling yourself so is only making excuses for the company.
Right now I make $0, and I have a family to feed, house, and provide healthcare for.

Please don't presume that you have enough information to rebuke me.

Well said. I appreciated the tone. Thanks for defending yourself and your career decisions against those that no nothing about your personal circumstances.
s/no/know/

Haven't made that mistake in awhile...

I don’t see how this offers a different take than what I posted. They’re offering you more money than you currently make and you have necessary expenses. So you’re considering it.
Here are the parts of your post with which I disagree:

> It’s not complicated.

You didn't know what tradeoffs I have to consider, so I doubt you can know if the decision is complicated or not.

In actuality, my decision involves guessing at the likelihood of various outcomes, and how they relate to competing ideological goals.

> Telling yourself so is only making excuses for the company.

You guessed (wrongly) about my thought process. Furthermore, I don't see why you had any confidence to make that guess, let alone chastising me based on that guess.

It doesn’t seem so. You are prioritizing your family over ideology. That’s because you are being paid to do so. These are the brass tacks.
I don't think we're using the same definition of ideology.