I bet information about his software is around elsewhere, and now ChatGPT will make up even more. I don't know how this is fixed. Structured queryable data, I guess.
You are correct, but if I demonstrate that I have done what I could to deny OpenAI access, and they still have it in their model, then I probably have more legal recourse against them.
But what legal recourse? chatGPT could be considered a search engine, and technically scraping public facing sites without a login is perfectly allowed and legal. The best you'd be able to do is a dmca request, I'm not sure how they'd comply with that though. I've seen dmca requests in Google, when someone's work is being offered free without their permission. I'm guessing this would be the same sort of situation.
I wonder if they can selectively block or remove specific content from the LLM. Personally I think it's a fools folly to even try.
AI chat is the new interface to search, I use ai powered search engines for 90 percent of searches. sometimes I still go to the source website so there's still a chance of search engines bringing revenue.
Personally I think there should be a way for them to reward sites in a medium like program where views or uses as a resource are points for a share of the revenue for the month or something.
I don’t think you have any legal recourse, even if training isn’t considered fair use (which it seems to be) I don’t think you can copyright having knowledge of how to use a library or piece of software (maybe the specific way you write the documentation is but it will infer it from other sources instead)
You are correct, but if I demonstrate that I have done what I could to deny OpenAI access, and they still have it in their model, then I probably have more legal recourse against them.