|
|
|
|
|
|
by mpweiher
1032 days ago
|
|
|
The reason not to define these things is exactly so C can be used as a high-level assembler, and the answer is always “whatever it is that the CPU naturally does” "Committee did not want to force programmers into writing portably, to preclude the use of C as a “high-level assembler:” https://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG14/www/docs/n897.pdf p10, line 39 "C code can be portable. " line 30 |
|
|