[eesmith]

I have done so, but did not find enlightenment about the true purpose of patents.

Perhaps you did not explain it well enough and can provide more details?

Without it, I see no serious conflict or disagreement between my quick summary and the more complete history at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_patent_law

[flangola7]

> I have done so.

You very obviously have not. I'm not going to do your job for you and spoon-feed it to you like a child. This isn't complicated, any truly introspective person with critical thinking skills can handle this.

[eesmith]

Perhaps you posted your comment using another account? The only thing I see from you on the topic is at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37172256 , which is:

> "That is not what a patent is for. It may unfortunately currently be legal, but that isn't its true purpose."

I know the original purpose of copyright was to inhibit publication the government did not want, which only later became modern copyright. I cannot find anything equivalent for patent law.

If its true purpose is to make money for the elite, I think that's no surprise to anyone. But that seems to be the purpose of most laws, and no reason to single out patent law nor be so opaque.

Given that several others responded to your comment the same way I did, I suppose you think we are all like simple-minded children. I trust you realize that even the smartest of people may need more than "isn't its true purpose" as a hint?

I do hope your "study it out"[1]-like response isn't hiding some baseless conspiracy theory.

[1] https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2012/10/12/1143767/--Study-...

Romney Supporter: All you have to do is study it out. Just study it out and you'll see. You haven't done your homework, buddy.

Matthews: What do I need to study?

Romney Supporter: He's a communist. And those of us who are not voting for him know it.