[kitchi]

I'm quite puzzled by this comment. A quick glance through the article and there seem to be several references to what appear to be serious academic work.

So is the issue with the work of the academics? Or the way Wikipedia has put together the article? I'm not a historian by any definition of the word and in quite curious about this.

[klntsky]

The funny is in how the religious overtone of the subject collides with the usual science-ish manner of wikipedia editors.