Its telling that all the advertising in the media you see of the prototypical digital nomad is someone at a cafe or in a hammock with a laptop, versus someone with three monitors and a herman miller chair.
I wonder how much this feeds into the negative image many people have of "working remotely" as barely working. It might fall into a pattern where framing something as nicer than it is makes it less likely that we as a society continue to permit the thing. A similar case would be all new housing being positioned by developers as "luxury housing".