[zb3]

I don't consume any of those, I'm just saying what would be better for me.

However, abolishing copyright is not the same as making monetization illegal. My view is that people should be paid for their WORK, and copying something doesn't make the author work more.

This'd mean the funds 'd need to be bootstrapped (crowdfunding?) before the work is done, but then it'd be free to distribute it.

[CodeSgt]

The first sentence of your initial comment I responded to was ‘It would be great if such "creative" works were simply impossible to monetize.’

[8note]

The difference being that the artist can still be monetized, even if the art isn't.