[9diov]

There are cases when the OOP way clearly has the disadvantage. That's why you need visitor pattern (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visitor_pattern?useskin=vector). The ADT approach is superior in those cases, as stated in the link above.

[munificent]

There are cases when the FP way clearly has the disadvantage. That's why you need the "record-of-function-pointers" pattern. The interface-and-implementations approach is superior in those cases.

[9diov]

Haha lovely, clearly we are in agreement here. You even put that in your book isn't it?

> The Visitor pattern is really about approximating the functional style within an OOP language (source: https://craftinginterpreters.com/representing-code.html)

The expression problem is one of those "mathematical duality" or yin-yang thing in software design that are less well-known for some reason. People keep pointlessly arguing in favor of one or another without knowing this duality.

Another favorite of mine is SQL vs NoSQL which Erik Meijer mathematically proved to be dual of each other using category theory (https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1961297).

[trashburger]

Are you talking about the specific case in the expression problem article? It seems to mainly be a problem when an object's behavior can't be modified, either through the language faculties or through other means like a module system. I don't disagree with its conclusions but I believe it to be a problem of language capabilities.

[igouy]

Maybe we'd all be happier with multi-methods

https://nice.sourceforge.net/visitor.html