[function_seven]

But that makes it too easy to lie, omit, and equivocate. If the LLM is trained on all of their public statements over the last X years, and any official documents authored by them, then—theoretically!—you get something that's harder to manipulate.

[retrocryptid]

Aha. I was thinking you were suggesting it be trained by the campaign. I'm usually bearish about how LLMs are being used, but if you created a corpus of legit sourced documents that humans could peruse, and added a feature to the LLM that allowed it to cite which document(s) it used to answer a question, that would be quite interesting.

[commondream]

"As a supporter of Ron DeSantis I can neither confirm or deny if I am more accurate than an official policy document."

[mrguyorama]

Why do you think an LLM, which has no connection to the actual candidate, would be able to give you useful information about said candidate?