[dragonwriter]

> > The generalization abilities of models are good enough in other contexts that its plausible that realistic nude children could be generated by a model with no nude children in its training data that was otherwise trained on both clothed children and nude adults. I have no plans on testing this, however.

> Stable Diffusion has failed me for much simpler interpolations than the one you're describing

Its succeeded for me in much more complex ones. SD (even with the same exact set of checkpoint, LoRa, etc., and other workflow elements) isn't consistent across apparent-to-humans complexity levels in its generalization ability, and there are a very large combination of potential combinations.

> You can convince me by showing an example

Yeah, I'm not going to try to make simulated child porn for you, and while I would have sided with you in the debate over whether your earlier proof request amounted to a request for that, this one very clearly does.

[_6atf]

Jesus, what is wrong with you? I clearly asked for an example of complex interpolations. How am I "very clearly" asking for CP when we're talking about complex interpolations, not CP?

Please, explain how I am "very clearly" asking for it. Please. Literally both sentences preceding the one you quoted (as in, the entire paragraph containing this sentence) are talking about interpolation. How do you jump from interpolation to CP??