|
|
|
|
|
|
by raverbashing
1036 days ago
|
|
|
Well, at least you're trying to compensate with PV. That's fine by me > overheating their rivers and Germany has to fill the gap Germany is filling the gap by importing electricity from France > we still have to figure out how to get rid of the existing nuclear waste Maybe ask France or the US, they seem to be more practical on how to do this > Uranium has to be imported from other countries. And PV panels don't? You need many less trucks of uranium than of coal > We still cannot eat Mushrooms and Boar from Bavarian forests due to Chernobyl. I know. But this doesn't sound too healthy neither https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11900206/ |
|
|
Not to disagree, but the picture is more complex.
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/even-crisis-germany-...
> Maybe ask France or the US, they seem to be more practical on how to do this
Was curious about that as well, but I only keep finding "solutions" that are in the make or disputed.
This is from 2014, so maybe they found a solution in the meantime? https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26425674
I'm also trying to find the final costs of any disposal.
Renewables aren't without problems of course. We still need a solution where the blades of the wind turbines don't end up in landfills. That's effectively not renewable.
> And PV panels don't? You need many less trucks of uranium than of coal
I don't understand. Coal isn't required to build PV? We once had PV industry here but everything moved to $China :(
> I know. But this doesn't sound too healthy neither https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11900206/
Not sure why everyone assumes I'm pro coal when I explicitly stated that I'm trying to push renewables.