Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by whalesalad 1033 days ago
The problem is all the rapha weekend warriors blocking roads. I’m a cyclist and a car enthusiast and so I straddle the line between both groups. Obviously cyclists are the underdog here but they aren’t all angels.
6 comments

So the thousands of uber eats drivers blocking the roads to transport a sandwich are a non issue, but a tiny number of people using the roads to go somewhere on the weekend are?
False dichotomy fallacy.
Is there safe bike infrastructure on these roads? If not, where else are they supposed to ride?
When you choose to ride in a 55+mph two-lane highway in the country side when you've got logging and gravel trucks continually passing you, I don't know. Can we consider that a death wish, no matter what the law says on paper?

These aren't commuters as it is ~40 minutes by car to the mothership and they're most often found on the nice days during the weekend wearing spandex, sometimes even with numbers on their back.

No, that’s not actually “the problem”
what is? there is no problem if you understand the way the world truly works. people drive cars. the utopian bicycle world does not exist.
“The world”—this all depends on where you live. There are plenty of places that are very bike-friendly. How do you think they got that way?
sure fine. try nothing. fix nothing. better nothing. do nothing. accept the bad.
There are lots of problems. But if you think that one of them is groups of people engaging in athletics and enjoying the outdoors, then I would suggest that one of the problems may be in the mirror…
*using roads
I ride in the road. I occupy a full lane. I use my u-lock to dent body panels when needed. There’s still a way to coexist with cars and a way to be an obnoxious rider.
Occupying the full lane is the suggested way to ride for your safety. Drivers will attempt to kill you if you ride on the side by running you in to the gutter to perform an unsafe overtake.
I've never heard of this, are cyclists in your area just sitting in the road?
Yeah honestly the bikers that I hear people rage about are the folks who ride in the middle of roads, especially uphill, and who don't even try to let folks pass. They get mad at people driving slowly like that too.

Independent of who's "right", when I bike, I don't do that, and can't say I've ever had anyone in a car angry at me.

Taking the lane is really the only way to bike safely in traffic though unless there is a ton of space for cars to safely pass.
I've see people move into the middle of the lane for an approaching car so it won't pass, and when there would've been room to pass safely.

I think these folks are the ones giving bikers a bad name by being antagonistic to prove a point.

They aren't being antagonistic, they are protecting themselves. Allowing a motorists to pass you without leaving their lane is a really good way to end up dead and is also illegal on the motorists part. They are moving over to force the motorist to pass them in a legal and safe manner.
If I'm driving well under limit due to towing, looking for address, etc - I pull over and let people pass. It's not so hard for a bike to do same.

I've also seen bikers upset when a kid is going slowly in a bike lane? So I think many of the spandex-clad dudes have some control issues.

I felt like you just ignored the point of the person replying to you. Cyclists are in more danger from passing cars when they aren't in the middle of the lane, as they tend to get run off the road. When they are in the middle of the lane, the other car needs to perform the same passing technique they would normally do (exiting the lane and getting into the oncoming traffic lane).

The chances of you getting into a wreck for pulling over getting hit in a Tow Truck is in no way equivalent to a cyclist doing the same thing. You have visibility and weight.

As a non-cyclist, ya it can be a pain in the ass, but the cyclist has the legal right to the whole lane.

>If I'm driving well under limit due to towing, looking for address, etc - I pull over and let people pass. It's not so hard for a bike to do same.

Thats cool! It's also not hard for motorists to wait literal seconds to safely pass a cyclists. Cyclists shouldn't need to pull over all the time to accommodate motorists need to speed down the road. You aren't entitled to go 10 mph over the speed limit. It's a limit, not a minimum.

>I've also seen bikers upset when a kid is going slowly in a bike lane? So I think many of the spandex-clad dudes have some control issues.

Wow! You did? Crazy! It's almost like a group of people with a shared hobby aren't a monolith and will display different opinions and behaviors!

Let's imagine a country road with a windy uphill bit, such as one where you might get stuck behind a cyclist going uphill.

The speed limit is 80km/h, but through the windy bit, you can only average 60km/h.

Let's assume the rest of the time you average 80km/h.

Say the windy bit is 2km, and the rest of the journey is 38km.

This trip would normally take you 30 minutes and 30 seconds:

    ((38/80)+(2/60))*60 = 30.5
Now let's assume you get stuck behind a cyclist going uphill at an average of 10km/h during the 2km windy bit:

    ((38/80)+(2/10))*60 = 40.5
So your trip time increases by 10 minutes.

Now compare that to a typical peak hour traffic delay.

Why are people willing to endanger the lives of cyclists for what is a very mild, occassional traffic delay?