[mdaniel]

> I have a hard time thinking of how terraform as a piece of software can do to much more than it already does to fix things?

Oh, that one's easy: have the "plan" phase actually consult the underlying provider in order to know the straight face errors that are going to fail 60% of the way through your "apply" phase. I thought about including an example, but I don't care to try and lobby unless the community fork takes off, because Hashicorp gonna Hashicorp _their_ baby

Look, I know the TF community is allllllllllll about that Omniscient .tfstate file but (related to the sibling comments about the tool _being helpful_) the real world is filled with randos in an organization doing shit to underlying infra or humans fat-fingering something and it is not a good use of anyone's life having to re-run plan and apply due to some patently stupid but foreseeable bug

[0xbadcafebee]

1000%. The state file causes way more problems than it solves. The tool makes no attempt to look for an existing resource, or import existing resources, or absorb or ignore changes; you have to manually intervene. Meanwhile production is broken because only half the apply succeeded, but you have no idea if it'll blow up until you apply. No idea if you've set the necessary lifecycle policy correctly for this resource; you'll need to destroy the resource or rename something and see what happens. It's ridiculous.