Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by AmericanChopper 1043 days ago
> hasn't really been taken seriously in the field for decades, except by naysayers like yourself who continue to use it as a strawman.

…and by basically the entire general public. Big pharma did a great job on the “depression is a just a chemical imbalance…” awareness campaign, but absolutely dropped the ball on the “actually we were wrong about that” campaign, so that’s still what most members of the public tend to believe.

1 comments

Can you name one topic of bleeding edge research on which the general public's understanding is not either outdated, oversimplified, or both?
The reason it’s outdated in this case is because the pharmaceutical industry invested so much money and time into selling Prozac to the public, for a treatment that was ultimately ineffective, and then of course invested no money at all into correcting the public’s subsequent misunderstanding. So unlike what you’ve claimed, this isn’t a concept taken seriously only by naysayers who want to use it as a strawman. It’s a concept many members of the public generally believe to be true, because the experts spent so much time and money telling them it was.