|
|
|
|
|
by mikerg87
1038 days ago
|
|
No numbers, but anecdotally we turned off DKIM. Telling end users we are rejecting their otherwise email because they don’t have DKIM implemented. SPF and DMARC compliance got better over time but DKIM compliance just never did get better. |
|
I'm coming from the other side of the equation. I work for a (small-ish, niche) CRM company, and have insisted that all new customers be very explicitly told that they have to set up SPF and DKIM properly during their migration/implementation.
It would be nice to have something to send them to point out "here's where X% of your emails will go to spam if you don't do this, plus you're Y% of an annoyance on our mail server's reputation, too" but there's not any hard data to be found.