|
|
|
|
|
by bussyfumes
1040 days ago
|
|
Don't discard the juniors, maybe ask them to process your prompts for you. That'll give you some space. I feel the opposite: I had a great experience asking GPT-4 to do some tasks for me and have been feeling like I'm missing out ever since by not using it more often. However, I'm wary of posting work-related code into it so I either have to come up with similar examples, which is time-consuming or ask it conceptual questions for which I haven't been able to make it much helpful. Sometimes I even noticed that a conversation with a colleague produced a much better result and it wasn't even something very specific to the project. So yeah, I feel like it's a great tool but I'm having a hard time using it productively. It definitely feels like being creative with your prompts is an important part of getting value out of it. |
|
GPT can give incorrect, bad, or non-functional code. A senior engineer that reviews GPT responses will (hopefully) spot that and rectify it right away. Junior engineers can end up being less productive and not learn a lot when encountering this.