Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by notphilatall 5207 days ago
That's only an option if you're shuttering the product of your own will. If you're part of a talent acquisition (which is the case with Posterous and Milk), the purchasing company would have to make that call, so you should really address the blog post to them.

It's unlikely any of them would: they just paid a bunch of money and acquired the team plus source, and even if they don't use the acquired source, open-sourcing it is extra work and/or a liability. The team, on the other hand, may still have faint hopes that the company will do something with their product.

In the cases where it's clear that the team's energies will be focused elsewhere the team could try to include it in the terms of the acquisition, but were I in those shoes I'd probably not want to risk souring the upside or acquisition as a whole.

1 comments

In a talent acquisition, disposition of source code assets would be up for negotiation among principals prior to closing the deal.

No reason founders couldn't specify this as a condition. Or make it an explicit term of their service agreement to customers/users well in advance of this eventuality. Something like:

"In the event COMPANY concludes business operations or discontinues SERVICE for any reason, including but not limited to sale or acquisition of COMPANY or relevant assets, COMPANY will license SOFTWARE under the terms of $FREE_SOFTWARE _LICENSE, in the preferred form of SOFTWARE for making modifications to it, inclusive of any build, deployment, operations, management, and documentation support."

Where the free software license would be specified, though generally I'd expect this would include a license meeting the FSF's Free Software Definition or the OSI's Open Source Definition and certification.