[rstat1]

For the part that most people care about (which is the userspace side, that comes from the Mesa Project) you can freely update it to whatever is the latest version without really having to care about the kernel side. The only point at which the kernel side of the GPU equation actually matters for Mesa is when new HW comes out.

>>you can install the latest GPU driver on Windows 10 just fine, and it is the same driver as the one on 11

MS is certainly well known for breaking Windows drivers across major releases. The only reason that Win10 and 11 driver is the same is because Win10 and 11 are more or less the same thing.

[kmeisthax]

To put a finer point on driver breakages... part of why Vista was so disastrously bad at launch was specifically because they'd drastically changed the DirectX kernel driver model to support DWM[0]. Nvidia in particular was responsible for a third of all Vista crashes, with another third being ATI (now AMD RTG). WDDM was a moving target right up until launch and it took about a year for Vista to actually be usable[1].

[0] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/d...

[1] A year afterwards of trying to convince people that Vista was good now (which it was), Microsoft threw up their hands and released Windows 7.

[Dalewyn]

>MS is certainly well known for breaking Windows drivers across major releases. The only reason that Win10 and 11 driver is the same is because Win10 and 11 are more or less the same thing.

Not quite accurate, it depends on whether a new version of Windows has a significantly newer kernel.

Windows 2000 and Windows XP (and all its derivatives) share the NT5.x kernel, and thus drivers for any of them generally work in the others. Likewise Windows Vista/7/8/8.1 which all share the NT6.x kernel, and Windows 10 and 11 which share the NT10.0 kernel.

[wtallis]

In other words, it's pretty common for Windows users to experience major driver breakage every time they upgrade to a new major version of Windows. Because it was pretty normal to go from Windows 9x to XP (skipping 2k), then skip Vista and not upgrade until 7, then skip 8 and 8.1 and not upgrade until 10. The exceptions were mostly if you bought a new computer that had one of the more disappointing releases preinstalled, but in those cases driver breakage would have been much less of a concern anyways.

[ftaghn]

>In other words, it's pretty common for Windows users to experience major driver breakage every time they upgrade to a new major version of Windows

This is really a high level arguing in bad faith here. Windows XP was released in 2001 and mainstream support ended in 2009 with the last security update in extended support being in 2014. Vista to 8.1 covers 2006 to 2023, that's 17 years of having compatible drivers. Windows 10 was released in 2015, 8 years ago, with 11 having a compatible driver model and will go for many years still.

What does "common" to experience breakage is supposed to mean here? you call this common? meanwhile you can't even get a Google Pixel, the official Google phone, to be supported more than 3 years of feature update, with 2 more years of security updates. This is all because supporting the linux kernel is a pain in the ass.

[Dalewyn]

I'll also add that it is very common for hardware manufacturers to just provide drivers for newer versions of Windows as they come out if necessary, with the hardware ending up supported across multiple versions of Windows.

It is very seldom when you actually come across hardware without drivers, unless the hardware is so old that the manufacturer isn't selling (and thus isn't supporting) it anymore.