|
|
|
|
|
by K0balt
1047 days ago
|
|
Lol, nah. I might not put something like this up myself but I don’t mean that others shouldn’t be free to. I do think that other than a potential source of data for training for these kinds of situations, the utility is offset by the anti-utility. But as a source of specialised training data? Skeevy but probably effective. Hopefully it’s later rather than sooner that generative AI is implicated as a contributing factor in a mass shooting or something else horrific though. People are always looking for ways to share the blame. As for TOS writing it’s good to keep in mind that the only binding provisions in a TOS is the ones that a judge (or jury, IA) finds reasonable under the circumstances that they are contested. |
|
Oh no, a civil lawsuit with an out of state LLC that has little to no information for service processing in your state's way. With no indication of ownership structure that gives any insight into what you'll collect from a favorable judgement.
Oh no, anything but that.
Liability is a "user funnel" where lots of potential plaintiffs get bounced. Just make it more expensive.
The risk about finding if a provision is binding exists for a plaintiff too, greater risk.