Running a webserver on your phone incurs all the same issues plus it might be out of range or your phone might be off. So having a webserver on your phone is actually worse.
Yes if none of those things are problems then it isn't an issue. Just that there aren't fewer issues with having a website on your phone by a company that doesn't have a core business of letting people serve http from their phone vs. having it hosted somewhere by a company where it IS their core business.
No, I’m saying that trusting [Internet service provider whom you don’t control] to keep your site up is pragmatically identical to trusting [web hosting company whom you don’t control] to do the same.
Why not work instead on reducing the number of roadblocks and services that you need to manage, rely on, hand over your rights to, and entrust them with your personal data?
I don't know about you, but that seems to me the logical thing to do
The third party doctrine means at any host your stuff can be warrantless searched, not the case for your phone except I guess that thing about anywhere 100 miles from a coast line or border or airport that covers most of the population.
Huh, what? The issues I mentioned proceed from using services you don't own or have power over. How can I suffer from such issues on my own device?
> out of range or your phone might be off
and? If the owner is ok with that, where is the problem? Are people not permitted to walk because a car is faster?