[tomcam]

Do you think Paul doesn’t want to comment his code perfectly? Is it your thought that he has unlimited time to create complex free software up to your coding standards?

You’re making a really good case for flagging comments, which I almost never do.

[PaulDavisThe1st]

Thanks for the defense, but to be honest I think GP has a point.

Why on earth I would have used 2's complement conventions for what is truly just a boolean/bistate flag is far from obvious, and it ought to be (better) commented.

One thing I would say in my own defense is that one aspect of remote-distributed cooperative development is that sometimes the conversations you have with others (e.g. on IRC, or mattermost or even discord if that's your thing) can sometimes feel as if you've just "written the documentation", even though it will generally vanish into the ether. I think that is what happened here. I remember discussing it with others on our IRC dev channel, but I don't keep logs.

[tomcam]

You’re a champ and I love you for that, but it’s no excuse for that kind of rudeness. There is literally no easier nor shallower critique in programming than one should’ve commented a little better.

You rock, literally!

[heavenlyblue]

No matter how free code is, if it can't prove to me what it does and it's design decision, it may as well not exist at all.

[aydyn]

mate, you need to relax fr. Its just a friendly jib

[tomcam]

Oops. Now I feel bad—my apologies.