[willow8349]

I think part of the problem is it seems everyone is trying to make a version control tool that is agnostic to all languages. Both computationally and UI wise. But C++ users expect to see different things than JavaScript users and so forth.

I’m surprised at the lack of hyper-specific language version control tools. I thought about making a side project for one in Julia a while back but not quite sure how it would look. Some random thoughts:

- info on type, name, constant changes

- let me checkout older revisions of individual functions / objects / whatever

- on unit test result changes for functions that have unit tests

- when changes are simply a refactor and are functionally the same

[mqus]

Most repositories I work on don't have only one language. They have at the very least two, like the main language and maybe markdown for README files, then configuration like .ini or .toml, json stuff, yml, xml, etcpp. And then you might have bash scripts, Dockerfiles, other build tool languages, etcpp. And those are only text files. You probably will also have images, maybe zipped stuff, office documents and more, all not the "core" repository content, but stored nearby and versioned alongside.

Building a hyper-focussed tool won't be very useful, expect to at least rudimentarily support other file types.

[willow8349]

This doesn’t really detract from my point - the “best” tool tool would use knowledge of python for python files, json for json files, and so forth. I think you’re just saying you’d want multiple of these rolled in a single tool as opposed to standalone, which is fair. I think any tool would have to be compatible with git /layer on top of it so it’s available as a fallback

[fanf2]

Off topic, but “etcpp” is a new one for me. Wiktionary suggests it is German, which amuses me because I write “etc. usw.” to mean the same thing.

[mqus]

whoops :D thought it was more international than this, since its pretty much as latin as etc. Interesting!

[jorams]

I read it as a little joke referring to C++, for what it's worth.

[maleldil]

What's the difference between etcpp and etc?

[fanf2]

The pp implies there are manny more things, as opposed to just some more things. https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/etc._pp.

[mqus]

sibling is right, although for me its mostly a habit, I rarely use etc.

[nathan_compton]

Can you imagine having to learn a bunch of different language specific version control tools? Sounds like a hassle to me.

[stevage]

No, because I only code in one language.

[pastage]

Every change is different in the same way every program is unique, the change of a couple of characters will alter the meaning. I think you have to try to write a diff UI to understand why it is hard.

Difftastic, Meld, diff -u, Word and other tools are amazing because they are usefull in many scenarios. Getting the UI right has been a long process, beingable to grok the changes is still hard even with thw best tooling. It is also a question of tool adoption it takes a long time to understand how a tool works.