|
|
|
|
|
|
by imiric
1036 days ago
|
|
|
> Potential competitors from that era, including, in particular, "Mercurial", largely fall into categories of "trade-offs". Which "trade-offs" are you referring to? Mercurial was, and still is, a solid DVCS. It's not often used today because it lost the popularity contest, due to several reasons[0], but technically it's as good as Git, and functionally it's even better. It has a much saner and friendlier UI, which is the main complaint about Git. [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37095925 |
|
|