[unsubstantiated]

> Am I the only one who sees a jumbled stream of barely coherent semi-thoughts and word salad?

Probably one of the few given the majority of the comments are directly addressing and dissecting each point of the post.

It is not jumbled, but it is 1) the way Hotz usually writes, 2) unconventional, 3) cross-domain laterally connected, and 4) somewhat heavy for a sunday morning read.

Hotz generally doesn't do "barely coherent semi-thoughts." I think the label is needlessly harsh. He's just addressing the contemporary nonsense by bridging them together and calling their bullshit out.

It's sad to see so many of the replies to your comment are people attacking him for no good reason.