|
|
|
|
|
by Macha
1044 days ago
|
|
I'm not sure if we're agreeing or not to be honest. I'm not sure if you're implying it's a bad thing that people won't contribute to AGPL+CLA (and thereby justifies these more restrictive licenses), or agreeing that people shouldn't contribute to AGPL+CLA (and thereby volunteer their time to the benefit of one specific vendor). |
|
I view that as a very different question from whether its ethical to advertize something agpl+cla as being open source.