|
|
|
|
|
|
by sokoloff
1041 days ago
|
|
|
According to the account of someone who has a substantial vested interest in that being the case. (It might be the case, in which "they got what they asked for".) In a case where each side has a substantial vested interest in their story being accepted as true, it's wise to be skeptical of the claims on both sides and look for other, corroborating or contradicting evidence. |
|
|
1. Did not inform him of pivot and generative AI art (false, even generated AI art for him)
2. Did not inform him of fundraise/inflows (also false)
3. Either of the above are not legal under Delaware law (also false)
We will find out in a few months I suppose.