|
|
|
|
|
|
by hannasanarion
1044 days ago
|
|
|
So? Falcon wasn't a human spaceflight program during that time, and it was also over-schedule and over-budget anyway. The advice isn't "no new launch vehicles should ever be invented ever", it's "if you want your human spaceflight program to be on time and on budget, don't include a new launch vehicle in the plan" |
|
|
And that advice is being questioned. Starship aims at cost reduction which can't reasonably be achieved by incremental improvements to the status quo.
The "on time" part with Starship is what was formally promised to NASA with the Moon landing vehicle. This may - probably will - slip, but I currently doubt it will slip a lot. Other times regarding Starship are in the realm of estimates or wishful statements. The "on budget" part is something which I doubt even SpaceX accountants may answer - just as software engineers have troubles answering the time - and therefore budget - of a system to be delivered.
The law shows its age. On the other hand, it never claimed to be an absolute truth.