|
|
|
|
|
by tomatocracy
1041 days ago
|
|
The interesting thing (to me at least) about the rule against perpetuities is that it never prevented (at least in England) the the one thing you would have thought it was actually aimed at - fee tail estates (ie interests in land which are essentially a series of life tenancies to heirs specified at the original grant) because those were specifically provided for by statute (although other ways to get out of entailed estates were devised). |
|