[jmcqk6]

I agree that the Goldman response is funny, but that is not enough to dismiss the claims in the OP.

Several times now there have been internal documents and emails released that verify not only that there are people in GS that really are not looking out for their clients, but this was a fundamental strategy when it came to at least some of the derivatives they were selling, knowing that they were shit deals.

Sure, the argument can be made that it's just a 'few bad eggs,' but that argument just gets you so far.

Now, it's not out of the realm of possibility that that some of these things are taken out of context. In IT, it's pretty common to vent concerning some... difficult customers.

I think it's fair to say that you're right that some good people work there. Conceding that, I would like to see more by GS to address some of these other things.