[kbenson]

It probably doesn't save you much, since you already built the chrome extension, but having done both I found that tampermonkey is often much easier to deal with in most cases and also much quicker to develop for (you can literally edit the script in the tampermonkey extension settings page and reload the page you want it to apply to for immediate testing).

[sublinear]

I might be wrong, but some sites can block 'self' origin scripts by leaving it out of the Content Security Policy and only allowing scripts they control served by a CDN or specified subdomain to run on their page. Not sure when I last tried this and on what browser(s).

You'd have to disable CSP manually in your browser config to make it work, but that leaves you with an insecure browser and a lot of friction for casual users. Not sure if you can tie about:config options to a user profile for this use case. Distributing a working extension/script is getting harder all the time.

[kbenson]

I don't recall if I've encountered that specific problem in tampermonkey (or if I did and it didn't cause a problem worth remembering), but you can run things in the extension's context as well to bypass certain restrictions, as well as use special extension provided functions (GM_* from the greasemoney standard) that allow for additional actions.

I do recall intercepting requests when I used a chrome extension to change CSP values though and not needing to when doing something similar later in tampermonkey, but it may not have been quite the same issue as you're describing, so I can't definitively say whether I had a problem with it or not.