|
|
|
|
|
by nordsieck
1041 days ago
|
|
> I really don't get all these people who insist on usingrebase instead of merge. I prefer not to squash before committing. I like having smaller commits in my history. And if you don't squash, then using merge to fix conflicts with main/master before merging looks a lot more confusing. > Who wants to spend time resolving meaningless conflicts?! Every time I try it, I instantly regret it. Typically it doesn't take a lot of time unless you do something weird. Although to be fair to you, it does take more time than using merge. |
|