|
|
|
|
|
|
by medo-bear
1046 days ago
|
|
|
> Lisps can be very flexible, but they usually lack static type safety, opening a wide and horrible door to run-time errors. People should do basic research before writing something silly like this. Qualifying your statement with 'usually' is just a chicken sh*t approach. Common Lisp and Racket have optional strong typing, leaving the responsibility and choice to the developer. Common Lisp is great for implementing compilers. You also have things like Typed Racket and Coalton. The latter is completely statically typed ala MLTON https://github.com/coalton-lang/coalton |
|
|