|
|
|
|
|
by hellodanylo
1041 days ago
|
|
> I question just how much productivity you've gained. Me too. It's an empirical question to be answered by those who will dare to try. > It's kinda like self-driving cars Strong disagree. Yes, neural nets are blackboxes, but the generated code can be idiomatic, modular, easy to inspect with a debugger, etc. > more formally specify the problem that an LLM is being asked to solve. That would be a great direction to explore. |
|
I think you missed my point.
If I'm inspecting code from another human, I'm going to make assumptions about the kinds of errors they're gonna make. There's probably obvious dumb stuff I won't look for because a human would never typically make certain classes of mistake. They're the self-driving car equivalent of driving into the back of a stopped semi truck because it was mistaken for a billboard, an error no human of sound mind and body would make.
So if I'm inspecting code written by a computer, I'll either 1) make those same assumptions and then run the risk of missing unexpected problems in the code, or 2) I'm gonna be overly cautious (because I don't trust the machine) and will examine the code with a fine tooth comb, which will take a great deal more time.