|
|
|
|
|
by cscurmudgeon
1039 days ago
|
|
Poor logic. Why should that matter? The initial argument was that no one should need that much money. The sporting events can't take place soley due to the star. Do you think the star built the stadium or did all the background work for a movie? By this logic, movies with novice actors should always do bad. > How many people bought or used a tech product solely based on the CEO of the company? Not explicitly. What about founder CEOs who built v1 on their own? |
|
Founder CEOs are founders of the company and of course they will receive large payouts. The gripe is with non-founder executive vp sliding into CEO jobs and going from making $1 million a year to tens or hundreds of millions of dollars a year practically guaranteed with all sorts of golden parachutes attached.