|
|
|
|
|
by izacus
1049 days ago
|
|
For a browser, it means permanent, forever, support for the format and continued maintenance and security patching for the library. Any CVE, any issue that might cause the browser to be insecure will be blamed on the browser and the developers will have to make sure any codec they use is safe forever. That's the cost for the maintainers. Codecs are historically one of the most problematic sources of security issues (they're complex code that handles malicious downloaded files) and supporting a new one is a rather big maintenance burden for everyone involved. And if Chrome gets backdoored by a JXL library security hole, everyone will blame Google for it. If, by any chance, supporting JXL becomes too much of a burden, everyone will again blame Google for being evil if they ever remove it from Chrome. |
|