|
|
|
|
|
by laerus
1054 days ago
|
|
The guy that tried to trademark the Webassembly name btw and it's constantly trying to hijack the community with halfbaked solutions instead of pushing forward the standard, cause Wasmer had beef in the past with bytecode alliance peeps. WASI and WASM move slow for a good reason, This is how proper science and engineering works. The "go fast and break things" mentality of silicon valley startups has mainly filled the industry with low quality software. |
|
Maybe they hoped to be like Docker, where the value-add was cohesive higher-level tooling on top of all the lower-level bits. If that's the case, then WASI would be an existential threat in that it (and the tooling people are building around it) commoditizes what would otherwise be Wasmer's special sauce. I'm speculating wildly, of course, but it would at least be consistent with Wasmer's/Sirius's apparent vendetta against WASI and the people working on it.
I hope Wasmer eventually finds a way to add value that doesn't rely on constant gaslighting and white-anting the standards process.