|
|
|
|
|
by techas
1041 days ago
|
|
Well, you could put incentives to make replication attractive. Give credit for replication. Give money to the researchers doing the replication/review. Today we pay an average of 2000€ per article, reviewers get 0€ and the editorial keeps all for putting a pdf online. I would say there is margin there to invest in improving the review process. |
|
The US system, and others, even attack people who dare to try and make science more open. RIP Aaron Swartz, and long live Alexandra Elbakyan.