|
|
|
|
|
by politelemon
1042 days ago
|
|
I can't believe I didn't know this before, but seeing that Medium runs a partnership program just made me realize why I often associate the site with being low quality. I will encounter it in search results, often around data science topics. The posts are usually poorly explained, with important details omitted and code snippets that don't work. It felt like the author was just padding the content out but now I can understand it; they were trying to meet metrics. > Earnings will be based on more meaningful metrics. It seems they've put thought into this so I will assume the best intentions here and hope that this does result in better quality! It must be tough to decide on this because I can imagine that Substack too has eaten a lot of Medium's lunch, and a typical kneejerk reaction would be to doubledown on attracting views over quality. |
|
Which all sounds sensible in a vacuum, but the internet is a big, dumb machine that can’t distinguish competence (or even correctness) from expertise, and you end up with hyper specific articles like “Testing SKLearn Lasso Models inside Flask-SQLAlchemy using Mocked Spark Fixtures in Pytest” that others end up clicking on and it rises to the top of Google under some narrow search terms because of engagement, even if the substance is completely bonkers.
And then you get second order parroting of these ideas because a new grad without the experience to identify cruft actually uses them in public repos, or as the basis to hunt down and answer every SO question remotely related to this, for that sweet karma.