[victor106]

No, it’s not.

In some places the implementation deviates from architecture and it’s useful to know if it did and how it did.

Also, not all projects have the time and money it takes to layout an architecture before actual implementation.

[nonethewiser]

So this is visualizing software implementation then, as opposed to architecture?

[junon]

Yes, not sure why they're using the term "architecture" here. It's a code structure visualizer.

[momirlan]

Sure, architecture is the process of actively creating a blueprint, not passively rendering an existing piece of code.

[chrisjj]

> not all projects have the time and money it takes to layout an architecture before actual implementation.

IME that kind of project gains nothing from adding it after.