Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by permo-w 1054 days ago
>repeatedly point to a wikipedia page and ignore any discussion of the actual contents of the page or how we define a standard, stamping your foot and saying "I’m right and it's so impossible I'm wrong that anyone with a different viewpoint must be lying"

overreaching? who knows? but sadly I think we can substantiate "childish". and let's be real, how can we describe repeated ad hominems and unfounded accusations in place of actual discussion? bad faith flamebait