|
|
|
|
|
|
by darkclouds
1044 days ago
|
|
|
> Controversially, agricultural societies late to industrialization, have more population now If you pointed the above out 123 years ago, would the British Empire change your mind? Population is just one metric of success. >So I doubt humans with AI will replace humans without. But they might out live them whilst the manmade chemicals that affect health, like (per|poly)fluoroalkyl (PFAS) that took decades for the law to recognise and legislate against, in much the same way understanding dialects of RegEx in conversation becomes more common place in every day conversation, in order to understand the evolving world we live in. Has survival of the fittest evolved into survival of the intelligent? |
|
|