[rex_lupi]

And yet, even with all your "years of training, education and experience", the said for-profit publisher is writing such low- quality science journalism articles. It's been only weeks and the article in a maliciously dismissive tone suggests all the replication efforts are in vain and pointless. Is this expected behavior from scientists? I am well-aware of the very high publication standards of Nature. I don't care it's a for-profit business. I don't care if, in the end the studies disprove the hyped claims. All I'm saying is this kind of shoddy poor-quality stuff isnt something I expect from someone actually serious about real science