[crote]

The conductors of your ohmmeter are not that important, though. You can work around that by using four-terminal sensing, and you can of course also calibrate your probes by directly touching them together. Even if your ohmmeter conductors have a resistance of several ohm, you could still get an accurate measurement if your tool has a high enough resolution.

A bigger issue is going to be sample size. A 1mm-diameter 1mm-long rod of silver has a resistance of about 20 μΩ (or 2e-5) at room temperature. That's already getting tricky to measure with lab-grade equipment without pushing insane currents through it, let alone anything even smaller. If you want to measure a 1m-diameter 1m-long silver rod (which would be 0.02μΩ or 2e-8) you could just push a few thousand amps through it and reliably measure that using a household multimeter in the mV range - but do that with a small sample and it'll evaporate.

[jacquesm]

> Even if your ohmmeter conductors have a resistance of several ohm, you could still get an accurate measurement if your tool has a high enough resolution.

Not that low in range though, you will end up seeing thermal noise that dwarfs your measurement.

[dclowd9901]

How about the wires connected to your probes? Or the internal electronics that are used to gauge resistance? How do you work around those?

[jacquesm]

Calibration. But electric fields across wiring in such sensitive applications is a real problem.

[paulmd]

simply build the material into a device that cannot work without superconduction and then see whether it does ;)