[spansoa]

> while the energy intensity to obtain it is decreasing.

Correct. Infinite Growth being the north star here, but it's not sustainable indefinitely.

[brobdingnagians]

Expansion into space would help mitigate a lot of things, and the more population pressure, with the accompanying increase in labour, the more likely that expansion is to take place.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12318767/NAS...

[antisthenes]

Expanding into space consumes exponentially more energy than doing the same things on Earth.

It's basically just wishful thinking and hand-waving away physics until we actually crack fusion and more or less free near-infinite energy.

Until then, it's just a pipe dream by techno-optimists.

[palata]

Who wants to go live on Mars, really? Spoiler: you can't survive outdoor, there are no animals there, no trees, no flowers, it's basically a big desert.

Wanna go further? Proxima Centauri (the next star) is really, really far. Actually even a lot further than that. We definitely won't go there, unless we discover completely new physics (but it does not seem rational to count on that). So it's either Mars, or something that looks like Mars (I don't know, Venus maybe?), or living in a spaceship. Which is a bit like living on Mars, but worse.

Let's try to survive on Earth first, shall we? Because right now we (as a species) are failing. And not because of external factors: just because of us.

[worik]

> Expansion into space would help mitigate a lot of things, and the more population pressure, with the accompanying increase in labour, the more likely that expansion is to take place.

How can expansion into space mitigate pressure on Earth in any meaningful way?