when do you think the British Museum will be able to publish an article on the neoclassical watercolors of Adolph Hitler without mentioning antisemitism, the holocaust, or WWII?
Babur conquered India about as peacefully as Ashoka did a millennium and half before him. Both were warrior kings who took what they wanted, spared the compliant and punished those who resisted. Their killing or mercy had nothing to do with vengeance, hatred, ethnic superiority or preserving the master race.
You really need to catch up on history, barring the revisionist junk being preached by the ruling BJP in India. If the British Museum had led a display on Genghis Khan or Aurangzeb, that would have been in bad taste. But this is Babur for God sakes, about as cultured or docile a king could get in 16th century while still being a conqueror of India.
Babur, in his own words (the Baburnama), explicitly talks about the slaughter of apostates and infidels, creating towers of their skulls, the glory of being a killer of non-Muslims.
The ethnic hatred is not only everpresent, it is celebrated.
You really need to catch up on history, barring the revisionist junk being preached by the ruling BJP in India. If the British Museum had led a display on Genghis Khan or Aurangzeb, that would have been in bad taste. But this is Babur for God sakes, about as cultured or docile a king could get in 16th century while still being a conqueror of India.