[taeric]

This article doesn't really follow the title? I was expecting some critique of existing software and why someone prefers alternatives. Instead, I got a list of excuses on why people haven't really looked at it.

Not that any of the points are bad. As read, they all seem like solid reasons to not use something. Indeed, the fact that frameworks have no reason to use these over user space constructs seems very compelling, all on its own.

The rest feels like a thinly veiled rewording of the second point? That is, this feels like advocacy that is blaming the messengers for not successfully convincing us that we should use this superior thing. Which... is still a heavy handed advocacy. :(