|
|
|
|
|
by s1artibartfast
1054 days ago
|
|
The point as I see it is that a job's requirements are what an employer wants the employee to do. All of these argument about WFH seem to assume a job's real requirements should be something different. A good example is people talk about companies wanting in person work to drive their real-estate value, ect. The obvious answer is "OK, so thats the job they are paying you for" |
|
Jobs that must be done in person will still be done in person, jobs that can be done remotely may be empowered to be done remotely. Employment is a negotiation, not edict from nobility. Maybe you have to prove the job can't be done remotely as an employer. That is a reasonable requirement.