|
|
|
|
|
by JeremyNT
1054 days ago
|
|
The fact that Meta is able to lie and call their restrictive licensing open source is nearly as misleading as "OpenAI." We need to do better than to repeat these claims uncritically. The weight licenses are not "open source" by any useful definition, and we should not give Meta kudos for their misleading PR (especially considering that they almost surely ignored any copyright when training these things - rules for thee, but not for me). "Not as closed as OpenAI" is accurate, but also damning with faint praise. |
|