|
|
|
|
|
by Mjux
5205 days ago
|
|
I understand the same content works by businessinsider brought this in context. Businessinsider apology types -
"We don't "scrape"
content, at least not in
the way Marco thinks we
do.." (http://businessinsider.com/marco-arment-business-insider-201...) Cameron koczon in http://m.alistapart.com/articles/orbital-content/ mentioned the same orbital content strategy, which my blog coverage - http://mjux.tumblr.com/tagged/strategy on aggregation and curation. The whole point of ".. this
transformation of our relationship with content will
force us to rethink existing
reputation, distribution, and
monetization models—and
all for the better." is move away from "read once and save".
Similar judgement - http://twitter.com/mjUX/statuses/169836710174277632
" content + credits reads as the only #contentstrategy."The via and h/t links make the same flaws but place only bits for twitter content. /edit: As much I enjoy the apropos elements in instapaper. It provides the same "context and immediacy" in twitter - http://twitter.com/mjux/statuses/179422000517873666
|
|