Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by overboard2 1049 days ago
You don't need a preexisting theory though, you just need to lack one that explains the results of an experiment
1 comments

Why would someone do an experiment without a theory to test? How would they know that a particular result was interesting without a theory about the expected result?
Because rubbing your chin doesn't accomplish anything, messing around with stuff does.
There are practically infinite combinations of things to mess around with. Which stuff do scientists choose to mess around with and why?